<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Daaaaaaaaa Bears!</title>
	<link>http://blog.chrisboorman.com/2007/01/31/daaaaaaaaa-bears/</link>
	<description>Bob Dylan, Investing, Marathon Running and More!</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 21:31:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: darrenh</title>
		<link>http://blog.chrisboorman.com/2007/01/31/daaaaaaaaa-bears/#comment-2328</link>
		<author>darrenh</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 10:40:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.chrisboorman.com/2007/01/31/daaaaaaaaa-bears/#comment-2328</guid>
		<description>What was the interesting thing? Oh! That. Yeah. I should have guessed. This post is good, but not good enough.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What was the interesting thing? Oh! That. Yeah. I should have guessed. This post is good, but not good enough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sneezy Melon</title>
		<link>http://blog.chrisboorman.com/2007/01/31/daaaaaaaaa-bears/#comment-2137</link>
		<author>Sneezy Melon</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 18:56:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.chrisboorman.com/2007/01/31/daaaaaaaaa-bears/#comment-2137</guid>
		<description>Lovely post. I like your pencraft and that’s great that you’ve opened this subject. Only fool can disagree with this!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lovely post. I like your pencraft and that’s great that you’ve opened this subject. Only fool can disagree with this!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Polen</title>
		<link>http://blog.chrisboorman.com/2007/01/31/daaaaaaaaa-bears/#comment-26</link>
		<author>Tom Polen</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Feb 2007 03:52:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.chrisboorman.com/2007/01/31/daaaaaaaaa-bears/#comment-26</guid>
		<description>Bears will win in some sort of blowout, simply because each of these writers believes the Bears will lose...

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2007/football/nfl/specials/playoffs/2006/01/31/experts.picks.super.bowl/index.html?cnn=yes

They all make "logical" arguments as to why Indy will win. I love it when any game goes against "logic."

I'll be rooting against these writers. No one is an 'expert' about a future event.

Cynically yours,

Tom Polen</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bears will win in some sort of blowout, simply because each of these writers believes the Bears will lose&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2007/football/nfl/specials/playoffs/2006/01/31/experts.picks.super.bowl/index.html?cnn=yes" rel="nofollow">http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2007/football/nfl/specials/playoffs/2006/01/31/experts.picks.super.bowl/index.html?cnn=yes</a></p>
<p>They all make &#8220;logical&#8221; arguments as to why Indy will win. I love it when any game goes against &#8220;logic.&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll be rooting against these writers. No one is an &#8216;expert&#8217; about a future event.</p>
<p>Cynically yours,</p>
<p>Tom Polen</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
